想去邊度?
入住/退房日期
選擇入住日期
人數及房間數
2位成人, 1間客房
尋找更多奇陶爾加爾酒店
胡斯塔納哈爾加爾湖宮殿度假村 (juSTa Lake Nahargarh Palace)






€ 36.74每晚
根據9月30日之價格,這是30日內最低價
推薦預訂理由

風景優美
客房景觀獲得多數用戶正面好評
熱門設施
餐廳
免費WiFi
游泳池
前台(24小時服務)
行李寄存
停車場(免費)
探索周邊
3
套房
1張雙人床或更大床型
2
豪華房
1張雙人床或更大床型
2
特級客房, 湖景
1張雙人床或更大床型
4
宮殿套房
1張雙人床或更大床型
賺KlookCash,下次預訂折抵消費
住客評價
全部
4.5+
3.0+
評論日期:2023年9月17日
2.0/5.0
低於平均工幹
Unfortunately the property is terribly maintained.
there is an odour of bats & pigeons in the corridors, it definitely needs a rehaul in terms of maintenance & proper upkeep & cleanliness. I would understand that it is difficult, however there is great potential in such a stunning property of amazing historic value, only if the management took it seriously. There was a rat in the a air conditioning unit - video attached (Room 124)
評論日期:2019年12月30日
4.0/5.0
很好與家人同行 · 與親友前往
The place is good. Good for family , couple or friends stay.
評論日期:2019年11月2日
1.0/5.0
低於平均與家人同行 · 休閒
This property very bad condition its 170 km from udiapur and 70 km from chitorgarh smell sewer in rooms
評論日期:2017年10月7日
4.0/5.0
很好 Worth staying 2 nights. relax, swim in the pool at sunset, good reasonable food cooked to your liking. Staff friendly and very helpful.
Please keep it up -It is too beautiful a property to see it crumble. Also the junk on the roof needs clearing into one spot or build a shed to contain it. Such a lovely walk up there but too much clutter and gas bottles, etc. Also move some of the thousands of pigeons away.
評論日期:2017年1月2日
3.0/5.0
不錯 Happy but disappointed... As such the hotel is in a remote village; and it was disappointing to know that the hotel does not offer accommodation for drivers..The deal I got was bit overpriced for the facilities offered.The advertised facilities of horse riding, archery, nature trail trekking etc were not seen. The rooms are clean; the food is good; BUT the palace like comforts that one may expect is missing. Food is expensive. The rooms lacked most basic facility like a bed side lamp for reading Or a large TV screen.
The staff are very pleasing and extended their best efforts to make stay comfortable.
評論日期:2016年12月12日
3.0/5.0
不錯與家人同行
There are very few options for good hotels around Fort Chittorgarh, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Lake Nahargargh Palace barely met the minimums. Equivalent to a 2* or 3* property in the US.
評論日期:2016年2月13日
5.0/5.0
極佳與家人同行
The room was welmaintained and looked after.. the whole place and experience is a dream. Could easily stay here for a week.. so relaxing and quiet place.
No stalls or hackers or beggers towards this castle.. it is so unlike any other lake palace in india!
評論日期:2015年1月8日
4.0/5.0
很好與家人同行
Pigeons made glasses hard to clean. Low occupancy also resulted in some ares unattended. Overall happy with our stay: great location in middle of lake, pleasant staff
評論日期:2014年8月24日
4.0/5.0
很好與伴侶同行
It is a nice getaway slightly away from Chittorgarh, the experience of staying in between the lake was amazing. The place has a homely touch along with beautiful views.
評論日期:2014年2月17日
2.0/5.0
低於平均 As an ordinary expectation (and as stated in Hotels.com), a hotel is supposed to provide these services
1) Bed
2) Telephone
3) Internet
4) Hot Water
5) Hot (or at least warm) food.
MORE THAN HALF OF THESE SERVICES WERE NOT PROVIDED!
2) Telephone to and from front desk (NOT WORKING).
3) Internet (NOT WORKING)
4) Hot water (NOT SUPPLIED EXCEPT BY WALKING TWO MINUTES TO FRONT DESK, MAKING SPECIAL REQUEST, AND THEN WAITING FOR FIFTEEN MINUTES
5) Food was not hot AND WAS BARELY WARM, OR EDIBLE.
6) Pigeon nuisance in and around room (LOSS OF SLEEP BECAUSE OF PIGEON NOISE). Pigeons fly in the face of guests. THEY FEED PIGEONS AND ATTRACT THEM? Is this a hotel – or a zoo?
MOREOVER, THESE ARE RECURRENT PROBLEMS THAT ARE NOT FIXED. THE REAL HOTEL MANAGEMENT WITH DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY ONLY VISITS ONCE A WEEK FOR HALF A DAY.
Since so many basic services are not provided, I conclude that the four-star price of the hotel, despite is beautiful setting, is unjustified. The local hotel manager and staff are very nice, polite persons. However, It appears that the organization’s “remote-control” management is not working to provide basic services at the hotel property level.




