Where to?

Check-in/out dates

Select your dates

Guests and rooms

2 adults, 1 room

Raja Inn Hotel

lot 246, Jalan Setia RajaSee map

₫ 385,504per night

This is the cheapest price in 30 days, based on the rates on 8 Sep

Top reasons for booking
Great view
Most user reviews comment positively on the view from their room
Popular facilities
Free WiFi
Luggage storage
Free parking
3.5/5Good 26 reviews
Exploring the area
Miri Airport, 8.2km, About 15 mins from hotel by car
Imperial Shopping Mall, 600m, About 9 mins from hotel by foot
Marina Beach, 1.4km, About 23 mins from hotel by foot
9
Executive Suite
1 double bed or bigger

City view

19
Junior Suite
2 beds

31.6 m²

City view

13
Superior Room
2 beds

15 m²

City view

14
Deluxe Room
1 single bed

14.0 m²

City view

14
Standard Room
1 double bed or bigger

11.0 m²

City view

Earn KlookCash for this booking & save on the next one

Read all reviews
3.5/5.0

Good

26 reviews
Location
5.0
Services offered
3.6
Cleanliness
3.3
Atmosphere & facilities
4.7
All
4.5+
3.0+
JIM
Reviewed: 2 Sep 2025

4.0/5.0

Great

Solo stay · For leisure

CLEAN ROOM...VERY HELPFUL STAFF...GOOD CENTRAL LOCATION...
Connie
Reviewed: 27 May 2024

5.0/5.0

Fantastic
Nice place
Brunei
Reviewed: 15 Feb 2024

5.0/5.0

Fantastic

Stayed with kids · For business and leisure

Very good
Paul
Reviewed: 3 Dec 2017

3.0/5.0

Good
Room was clean, and the location was good. Staffs were friendly. Somehow it was filled with unpleasant odour. And the hot water shower was not working.
Verified traveler
Reviewed: 3 Jun 2017

4.0/5.0

Great

Stayed with family

Room is spacious, location is good, price is reasonable.
zack
Reviewed: 15 Dec 2016

3.0/5.0

Good
Strategic location. But this hotel has no lift and elevator. Need to use the stairs
malays
Reviewed: 8 Dec 2016

3.0/5.0

Good
Located at the city..very basic with no fridge. Suitable for short stay
Jian Siong
Reviewed: 3 Dec 2016

3.0/5.0

Good

Stayed with family

No hot shower in room.
Pg Omar
Reviewed: 5 Sep 2016

3.0/5.0

Good
Comfortable
SIN PENG
Reviewed: 2 May 2016

3.0/5.0

Good
Short